C
Commercialpedia Indian Railways commercial circulars and policies

optimal decision making. The major reason for departmentalization is the multiplicity of different channels through which people are hired into the railway…

Currency not verifiedStudy materialfreight
Currency not verified. Nobody has confirmed whether this circular is still in force. Check the present position before relying on it. The official Railway Board PDF always prevails over anything shown here.

No official Railway Board PDF has been traced for this entry yet. The text below was read from the document held in the library.

TypeCommercial Circular
Topicfreight
CurrencyCurrency not verified

Summary

optimal decision making. The major reason for departmentalization is the multiplicity of different channels through which people are hired into the railway services and the resulting isolated structure of the various services Indian Railways is financed through: (i) its own internal resources (freight and passenger revenue, and

Text of the circular

1 
 
 
 
 
STATE OF INDIAN RAILWAYS 
 
 
Prachee Mishra 
 
   September 2018 
Business as usual may be 
an unsustainable prospect 
for Railways 
 
Railways finances and 
infrastructure investment 
are stuck in a vicious cycle 
 
In addition, the 
organisational structure of 
Railways needs an 
overhaul

1 
 
INSIGHTS 
Business as usual may be an unsustainable prospect for Railways 
Railways’ operating ratio has consistently been higher than 90% in the past several years, which 
indicates that its capability to generate operational surplus is low.  Further, its expenditure on staff and 
pension has been increasing.  Consequently, capacity growth is increasingly being funded through 
borrowings.  However, an increased reliance on borrowings may further worsen the financial situation 
of Railways.   
Improving operational surplus through fare hikes will be difficult for Railways because: 
(i) Railways’ freight rates are already higher 
than other modes of transport for several 
commodities.  Consequently, it has been 
losing out on the FMCG and automobile 
markets (which are preferring roads).  The 
share of Railways in total freight traffic 
has declined from 89% in 1950-51 to 30% 
in 2011-12.  Further, the freight basket is 
limited to certain bulk commodities, and 
heavy dependence on coal transport poses 
a risk to the business.   
(ii) Upper class fares face competition from 
low cost airlines and AC bus fares.  Any 
further increase in upper class fares means Railways will lose traffic to other modes of travel, 
which are either faster or provide better last mile connectivity.   
(iii) Second class passenger traffic which contributes to 67% of the total passenger revenue, 
continues to be cheaper than both road and air travel.  However, it may be difficult to increase 
fares as these services are used by the relatively poorer section of society.  The passenger 
business made losses of about Rs 33,000 crore in 2014-15, which are classified as social service 
obligations.  The question is who should bear this subsidy – Railways, or the central government; 
or in case of suburban rail - the state or the local government.   
Potential ways out from the current scenario could be to invest in: (i) Dedicated Freight Corridors that 
could bring back freight traffic, and (ii) high speed trains which could help improve passenger 
revenue.  These services could be priced higher side than other modes of travel, but they would 
provide superior services.  The challenge would be to make these services cost effective for the users.   
Railways finances and infrastructure investment are stuck in a vicious cycle 
Poor finances of Railways had led to low investment in infrastructure.  Low investment means 
Railways’ infrastructure and services take a hit (resulting in low speed, delays, and safety issues).  
Poor infrastructure and services result in loss of remunerative business for Railways which leads to 
further deterioration of finances.  This has become a vicious cycle for Railways.   
The rail network currently faces huge capacity constraints, and the high density network (network that 
connects metros) has already reached saturation.  With high levels of capacity utilisation, and the 
introduction of new trains, trains tend to slow down, and affect the quality of services.   
In addition, the organisational structure of Railways needs an overhaul 
The organisational structure of Railways needs an overhaul to create a structure that is more 
conducive for nimble decision making, and is more accountable.  Currently, decision making in 
Railways is centralised.  The Railway Board has the powers of policy making, operations, and 
regulation.  Railway zones have very limited powers with regard to raising their own revenue.  
Therefore, they are unable to contribute more effectively towards improving Railways’ revenue.  
Further, apart from its core function of running trains, Railways also engages in peripheral activities 
such as running

Extract shown above; the full text is available in the search app.

Related circulars

Search the whole library

Open this circular in the search app · Search all 4,233 documents