Benchmarks for promotion to administrative grades in Railway Services

No official Railway Board PDF has been traced for this entry yet. The text below was read from the document held in the library.

Summary

Benchmarks for promotion to administrative grades in Railway Services ' Very Good Plus - Two outstanding and| Very Good Plus —

Text of the circular

y

x

उत्तर मध्य रेलवे
' गोपनीय प्रकोष्ठ, प्रधान कार्यालय
इलाहाबाद - 211 015
North Central Railway
Confidential Cell
Headquarters Office
Allahabad-211 015

Confidential
No.GM/NCR/APAR/Policy Dated : 07.09.17

AGM
All P/CHODs
CAO — Construction

DRMs — ALD, JHS & AGC core ae OED S. & AGC

CWMs — JHS & STLI

Sub : Benchmarks for promotion to administrative grades in Railway
Services

Ref : Railway Board’s letter No.2017/SCC/3/09 dated 01.09.17. _
नंद 26 2

Please find enclosed herewith copy of Railway Board’s letter, referred to
above, regarding interpretation of benchmark for all Grades in view of already
introduced numerical grading for officers in Railways in the new APAR
format.

This may please be brought to the notice of all concerned, working under
you.

DA: As above. % ce 197 @ Fs

(Waseem Ahmad)
Asstt Secy (Conf) to GM
- ADRY For General Manager
el न
CMS/ALD 2 CNB
All! BO’

psu

RO)

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA/ BHARAT SARKAR ee :
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS/ RAIL MANTRALAYA

(RAILWAY pes
No. 2017/SCC/3/09_. & irs ge September 2017
ae

The General swage a ivalents,

(All Indian Railways, Pds, RDSO, NAIR) eet \

Directors/Training Institutes, CMDs/PSUs, etc. \
Sub: Benchmarks for promotion to administrative grades in Railway Services.
Ref: Board’s letter No. 201 5/SCC/3/09(pt.) dated 15.12.15.

As numerical grading has been introduced for officers in Railways in the new APAR format,
Board have decided that the interpretation of benchmark for all grades would be as under:

Revised benchmark ;

' Very Good Plus - Two outstanding and| Very Good Plus —
, three very good gradings in the last five | Minimum 39 points.

! years. However, minimum very good in
, each of the last five APARs.

NFU HAG | -do-

‘Very Good - The minimum performance
, benchmark will be very good in each of the
' last five APARs.

Grade
HAG

» Existing benchmark

Very Good — Minimum 35
points

NFU SAG | de:
‘NF SG

-do-

| Very Good - The minimum performance Minimum 35
; benchmark will be very good in each of the

! last five APARs.

“Good — should have earned two very good
and three good gradings or equivalent in
_ the last five APARs ;

Very Good —
points

Good ~— Minimum 29

points

2. However, while considering the above, the DPC would not be guided merely by the overall
grading, recorded in the APARs, but should make its own assessment on the basis of entries in
APARs, as sometimes the overall grading in an APAR may be inconsistent with entries, various
parameters and attributes. i
‘ ae

3. Railways/Production Units, Training Institutes, PSUs etc. are requested to bring the revised
benchmarks to the notice of all the officers. —_—____—"—"___—_—_”

SO”
(Sagarika Patnaik) 1° 17
Director (Confidential)/G

Railway Board
Ph. No.23047594

Related circulars

• Related: No. PC-VI1/2025/HRMS/15

Search the whole library

Open this circular in the search app · Search all 4,025 documents