No official Railway Board PDF has been traced for this entry yet. The text below was read from the document held in the library.
| Circular number | No. 2021/TC(FM)/18/23 |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-11 |
| Type | Commercial Circular |
| Topic | freight |
Clarifications on various issues raised by Zonal Railways w.c.t Sub: Clarifications on various issues raised by Zonal Railways w.c.t.
2021/TC(FM)/18/23-Part(8) 1/3104441/2024 भारत सरकार ~=GOVERNMENT OF INDIA रेल मंत्रालय ~MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS रिलवे बोर्ड RAILWAY BOARD) रेल भवन, नई दिल्ली - 110001 No. 2021/TC(FM)/18/23 - Part 8 Rail Bhavan, New Delhi -— 110 001, datect}jo9.2024 Pr. Chief Commercial Managers, Pr. Chief Operations Managers, All Zonal Railways Sub: Clarifications on various issues raised by Zonal Railways w.c.t. implementation of GCT policy Various issues are being highlighted by Zonal Railways w.r.t. challenges they are faced during implementation of GCT policy. The issues highlighted have been examined in this office. The issues raised and their clarifications are juxtaposed below - Clarification Guidelines for installation of EIMWB by private siding owner, where it becomes unavoidably essential to install the weighbride on railway land, are already given under RMC/Provision of Weighbridge/2019/0 dated 11.07.2019 and the same is also applicable over GCTs. Capital cost initially approved and vetted by Railway for common user facilities, shall be considered for reimbursement to the GCTO in terms of para 5.2.3 of GCT policy. Issues raised by ZRs Installation of EIMWB is mandatory within the GCT premises, however, in case of exceptional circumstances this may be installed partially or wholly on railway land In case of variation of estimation cost and actual, capital cost what documents can be considered for calculation of such escalated cost. ‘Further for sake of reimbursement of capital cost which is to be considered Sanctioned cost or executed cost. Clarification of Railway Board is solicited on the issue. ZR requested necessary clarification in this regard that whether the existing private siding / PFTs located entirely on non -railway land are also exempted from payment of land licensing for connectivity portion of Railway land. Whether there is any requirement to convert — existin It is clarified that existing private sidings/PFIs located entirely on private land, shall continue to pay land license fee for the railway land utilized for connectivity portion. The land license fee for connectivity portion can only be exempted (as per provision of para 13.0 of GCT policy) for such siding/PFT, if 1/3104441/2024 2021/TC(FM)/18/23-Part(8) terminal into GCT to avail benefit of waiver of land licensing for connectivity portion. It may be clarified if the GCTOs are eligible to get refund for the cost incurred for works like station building, booking office and passenger amenities if any, apart from the facilities as detailed in para 5.2 of GCT policy. As per provision in GCT 2022, staff cost including Commercial, Operating and other cost is to be borne by Railway only. it is suggested to include that the staff cost may be borne by GCTOs. The conditions as made for refunding of capital cost either in case of Common. user facilities or new block stations where loading in terms of MITPA _ is considered, may also be made applicable for collecting staff cost also - It is requested to clarify that whether proposal on railway land to be dealt from conceptual plan, FSR, IPA or directly from ESP stage. GCT on non railway land, where ESP already approved, but GCTO approached railways for revising the ESP due to some land _ issue, procedure to adopt for GCTO either manually or through GCT portal. If a proposal uploaded in GCT portal which was proposed on railway land with loop line, should be processed by operating dept. Or commercial dept. these are opted and approved for migration into GCT,. The works mentioned under para 5.2 of GCT policy, can only be considered for common user facilities, which is to marked on ESP, and accordingly same shall be reimbursed in terms of para 5.2.3 of policy. It is clarified that as per provision under para no. 14.1 of GCT policy, no cost of commercial staff will be charged from the GCTO. Thus Railway is only responsible to borne commercial staff cost. The operating staff, whenever required and deployed for
Extract shown above; the full text is available in the search app.
Open this circular in the search app · Search all 4,025 documents