C
Commercialpedia Indian Railways commercial circulars and policies

government to restore the contesting respondents to their promoted posts

· 2004-10-18
Historical — likely supersededCircularupgradation
Historical — likely superseded. This circular predates 2020 and has probably been replaced. Treat it as a record of what the rule was, not what it is. The official Railway Board PDF always prevails over anything shown here.

No official Railway Board PDF has been traced for this entry yet. The text below was read from the document held in the library.

Date2004-10-18
TypeCommercial Circular
Topicupgradation
CurrencyHistorical — likely superseded

Summary

High Court, by the impugned order dated 18.10.2004, dismissed the writ

Text of the circular

government to restore the contesting respondents to their promoted posts
which they were holding before the order dated 89.1999. The
Telecommunication Department challenged the said order of the Tribunal by
filing a batch of writ petitions before the Madras High Court. The Madras

High Court, by the impugned order dated 18.10.2004, dismissed the writ

petitions upholding the order of the Tribunal,

said order is challenged,

ese appeals by special leave by

appellant. The appellant has put forth the following contentions

“)
promotion involves advancement in rank, grade or both and is always a step

‘There is a clear distinction between upgradation and promotion, While

towards advancement to higher position, grade or honour, upgradation does
not involve promotion to a higher position and the pedestal of the employee
remains the same and the employee is merely conferred some financial
benefits by granting a higher pay scale, to overcome stagnation, The BCR
scheme introduced as per order dated 16.10.1990 was a scheme of

upgradation and not promotion.

ii)
ditional posts, principles of reservation would not apply. The J

Where there is only upgradation of existing posts, with cn

h Court committed a serious error by treating gg@Etadation as a

promoti hich reservation rules would appggifhe Tribunal and the
High Court ougl of this Court in AU India
Employees Association (Railways) vs. V.K. Agarwal - 2001 (10) SCC 165
and the decision of the Gujarat High Court dated 24.3.1999 in Special Civil
Application No.7576 of 1997 - Union of India vs, All India Non SC/ST

Telecom Employees Association.

I, Article 16(4) enables the State to make any provision for reservation
of appointment or posts in favour of any backward classes of citizens.
Article 16(4A) enables the State to make any provision for reservation in

matters of promotion, with consequential seniority, to any class or classes of

Related circulars

Search the whole library

Open this circular in the search app · Search all 4,025 documents